A lot of these terms must be defined before I use them. Choiceful means that there was a decision making process that was engaged when making the decision. Chosen means that the choice that my decision making process returned was the actual returned choice. In class the kleptomaniac was given as an example. Even if he decides that he's not going to steal, he still does, and in many cases he isn't held morally responsible, thus, he doesn't have free will. Unconstrained basically means that you aren't strongly compelled by another person to make your decision, the example given in class was the gunman threatening to kill you. You aren't held morally responsible for the choice you were coerced into making, in most cases, so you didn't have free will, your choice in that sense was constrained. That last one is also up for debate because which choice that person is making and if they know which choice they are making comes into play. That's what constitutes a free choice according to ayer.
I do have issue with soft determinism though, because how can we be held morally responsible if we were oh so lucky to be born with the conditions and in the environment to make that choice? Moral responsibility and free will go hand in hand, which is where ayer starts his argument, the problem is that I don't know if determinism and moral responsibility are compatible.
Sent from my Samsung Vibrant using Tapatalk.
|